At the end of last week, I was part of an excellent online discussion on the differences between teaching and learning, and the detriment of using the word “teach”. This conversation was held on Twitter and blog posts and comments, and was sparked from my post called The Role of Parental Instruction. You can see that Idzie responded here, and the comments on her post carried the conversation further.
So, I wanted to cap off my end of the discussion with my final thoughts (for now). In the end, I agree with both Tara and Idzie that the word “teach” can be detrimental because it focuses the attention on the teacher and does not automatically mean that learning happens. However, our society sees no difference between teaching and learning, and so they assume that where teaching happens, learning does also. In unschooling, the learning comes first. And then, when necessary the teaching. These situations would be when a child wants to know more about something and they decide to go to a person for that knowledge. They request the instruction. So, while there is a “teacher” involved, it is still child-directed. This is a much different model than, “I want you to know something, and so now I will teach it to you. Sit down and learn.”
I am in an unschooling Yahoo group and one member shared a story that perfectly illustrates this. Linda writes:
“Just under an hour ago, I saw an accounts ledger that my daughter has been keeping for her scout group, to keep track of their popcorn sale fundraiser. She was elected purser of the group, and accepted the office. This is the kid who hates math with a passion! If I had told her she must make up and keep an account book, including tallying up many separate sales, for some phony assigned school-ish project, she would have refused. But she came downstairs almost in tears a while ago because the amount of cash and checks in her cash box did not equal the amount she had entered in the book. She had recounted/added everything up 3 times! (With a calculator; it wasn’t the actual addition that was the problem; it was a missing or incorrect entry.)
“It turned out that she had $20 more than she thought she should. She was also absolutely certain that everything in the ledger had matched with the actual cash and checks in the box until just before last night’s meeting. Last night, she received some more cash and checks from one of the scouts, and hurriedly recorded it all as one lump sum in the ledger, at the end of the meeting. She couldn’t understand how she could have mis-counted it last night – even though she admitted she was rushed!
“Anyway, I calmed her down, assured her she was doing a fantastic job – especially for having caught her error before any more amounts were entered (and told having more money than she thought she should was a LOT better than having too little!), gave her a bottle of white-out, showed her where to white out the incorrect amount, told her to enter the cash and each check separately, recounted the money with her, and all was well. (All the previous entries were listed properly; no one had handed her cash and checks together before.)
“So, this is one example of how I “teach” my daughter. It was a real-life problem, and I helped her solve it.”
I love this example because it shows just how wonderfully unschooling works. There are myriads of these examples in the unschooling community, and in many situations teaching is involved. It’s just from an entirely different perspective than the schooling world understands.
And so, this is how we need to shift our thinking about what it means to teach. It is providing answers when asked by a curious child, or helping them work out a problem they could not solve on their own (but letting them try first and come to you with the problem). It is not (or should not be) parent or teacher-directed content thrust upon an unwilling mind.
Continue reading
example, learning, teaching